Critique Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words - 6

Critique - Essay ExampleThe authors are looking forrader to the best possible outcomes of pattern and taxation of marijuana in short, they talk about issues on legalization. Marijuana has become illegal because the organisation together with its law prohibits it in the startle place. The authors define marijuana to be legal when it is already adjust by the government and so potential tax must be obtained out from it. The authors look forward to this as for the sole purpose of funding the governments drug and law enforcement activities with the collected tax. Furthermore, they occupy that this forget potentially decrease marijuanas level of consumption, as its price will soar upwards up high as an upshot of taxation activity. Furthermore, the authors define the legalization of marijuana by supplementing it with the assumption or circumstance that is associated with its prohibition. The authors simply are trying to point out the assumption that legalizing marijuana will remark ably address gang crimes and violence that are associated with its distribution and usage. This would require substantial proofs in the first place which the authors unfortunately fail to elaborately discuss in their argument.Conversely, one of the probable strengths of the authors argument is its creation positive about the subject matter especially on the cost and crime control. In fact, the wide argument is substantially focused on the cost and crime control. Furthermore, the authors talk about the practicality in transaction with marijuana usage and distribution concerns. They bring out the entire issue to be highly associated with the common crimes that relate with marijuana usage and distribution. The authors are making the best of this opportunity to convince the public and polity makers with their stand by integrating into their arguments some important knowledge that comes from their areas of expertise. By profession, the authors are internal treat specialist and polic e officer. It is therefore